Introduction
The focus of this module will be on managing information, research and documents
in the digital age. In a world where the total yearly production of information
exceeds 1.5 billion gigabytes [1]("approximately 250 megabytes
of text for every man, woman and child on earth" or, to put it in analog
terms, the textual content of 1,500,000,000,000 books), the organization and
cataloging of that information becomes increasingly important. Even for those
of us doing research, the enormous amount of information available and useful
to us must, once it's in our possession, be made easily accessed and recalled.
Those responsible for the design and development of useful user interfaces
(UIs) have been hassling for years with the cognitive hurdles that make computers
difficult to use. Computer users, despite real-world metaphors like "file"
and "folder" being used in our UIs, have to learn how to make sense
of the abstract position of their data relative to that of their other data.
This organizational step is always the first to take, since it can help to speed
along even the smallest research undertaking.
For websites, this system becomes even more critical since you have files referring and even interacting with one another. When a webpage tries to pull up an image or link to another page, any missing or incorrect folder or file information can give you the dreaded "busted image" placeholder or 404-Page Not Found. For that reason, web designers try to follow some extra guidelines.
Several companies have gotten into the infoglut management business by helping researchers manage and utilize bibliographic information using computers. Programs including (but not limited to) EndNote, Reference Manager and ProCite allow you to automatically collect book and journal references from databases or library catalogues, search the Internet or organize the bibliographic references you find yourself.
Digital Bibliography (top)
An alternative metaphor for approaching the organization of exponentially expanding information is that of digital bibliography. In addition to the benefits that metadata cataloging offers, digital bibliography makes part of its method the skills and technologies that librarians and researchers have used for ages. By creating "subject gateways" that take advantage of standards and templates, digital bibliographers create focused hypertext lists of sources useful to the researcher.[2]
Metadata (top)
For large amounts of data (those 1.5*1012 books we're producing every year, for example), we need to create a system of data that describes that data. Card catalogs in libraries are fairly familiar metadata systems. Hopefully, with the use of structured and standardized methods of describing our data, we can create descriptive systems that can make it easier for computers to do much of our searching for us.
Some That Explain and Illustrate Metadata's Usefulness
HTML, for example, has a structure for metadata inclusion in HTML documents. Meta tags are used to define meta data. META tags can be very useful for Web developers. They can be used to identify the creator of the page, what HTML specs the page follows, the keywords and description of the page, and the refresh parameter (which can be used to cause the page to reload itself, or to load another page). And these are just a few of the common uses!
Related Articles (bibliography for this module) (top)How to Use Meta Tags
(Based on cnet.com)Meta tags are easy to implement on your Web pages. They look just like regular HTML tags, but they follow a few rules:
All begin with the word META, the element name.
All are located within the HEAD element.
No closing tag is used; the META element is an empty element.
When you use a meta tag, you define attribute/value sets. For each attribute, you assign a value. If you look back at the element declaration, you'll see there are several available attributes, only one of which is required. So, the format might be diagrammed as: <META attributeName="value" attributeName="value">.
And, since content is required, it will always appear in your meta tags.
This structure can be seen in all of the following meta tags:
<META name="author" content="Amy Cowen">
<META name="title" content="Mastering the Meta Tag">
<META http-equiv="refresh" content="5;http://www.cnet.com/">
<META name="Generator" content="Microsoft FrontPage 4.0">
<META name="description" content="Answers to Your Top Questions Regarding Meta Tags.")>All of these tags provide different information about the page. None of them contribute to how the content is formatted or looks.
[1] How
Much Information?
[2] The
Art and Science of Digital Bibliography